NEI Clinical Studies
Archived Page
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only. It was current when it was produced, but may now be out-of-date. Persons having difficulty accessing this information may contact kcl@nei.nih.gov for assistance. For reliable, current information on this and other topics, we recommend that you visit the National Eye Institute website index.
Central Vein Occlusion Study (CVOS)
Purpose | Background | Description | Patient Eligibility | Recruitment Status | Current Status | Results | Publications | Resource Centers | NEI Representative
Purpose
- To determine whether photocoagulation therapy can help prevent iris neovascularization in eyes with central vein occlusion (CVO) and evidence of ischemic retina.
- To assess whether grid-pattern photocoagulation therapy will reduce loss of central visual acuity due to macular edema secondary to CVO.
- To develop new data describing the course and prognosis for eyes with CVO.
Background
Central vein occlusion is a common retinal vascular disorder with potentially blinding complications. The two major complications are reduced central vision caused by macular edema and neovascular glaucoma caused by iris neovascularization. Other clinical trials have shown that laser photocoagulation is an effective treatment for complications found in diabetic retinopathy and branch vein occlusion, which have some features in common with CVO: neovascularization and reduced visual acuity caused by macular edema occur in all three disorders. Evidence from small-scale studies suggests that a grid pattern of photocoagulation reduces macular edema in CVO patients, although the associated changes in visual acuity are variable. The CVOS is a detailed investigation of grid pattern photocoagulation in a larger randomized group of patients.
Description
Eligible patients were divided into four groups:
- Group N: Eyes with extensive retinal ischemia (at least 10 disc areas of nonperfusion) were randomly assigned to receive panretinal photocoagulation or nontreatment unless iris neovascularization developed.
- Group M: Eyes with visual loss ascribable to macular edema were randomly assigned to receive grid-pattern photocoagulation or nontreatment.
- Group P: Eyes with relatively perfused retinas were followed to provide information about the natural history of the disease.
- Group I: Indeterminate eyes in which the retina could not be visualized accurately because of hemorrhage were followed in a natural history study.
Green argon laser with a slit lamp delivery system was used for all treatments. Photographic documentation of retinal changes was obtained at entry, post-treatment, and at specified followup visits for a period of at least 3 years. The frequency of followup visits varied according to the group to which the CVO patient was assigned. Visual acuity, the primary outcome factor in the group with macular edema, was measured according to a modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol at each visit.
Patient Eligibility
Men and women must have been age 21 or older and willing to return for followup visits for 3 years following assignment into the appropriate group and randomization. Each of the four groups has specific eligibility criteria. Patients with retinal vascular disease other than that specified in the criteria, such as diabetic retinopathy, were ineligible. Patients with macular disease other than that due to CVO were ineligible for that portion of the study.
Patient Recruitment Status
Completed. Recruitment began in August 1988 and ended in July 1992. Followup was completed in February 1994.
Current Status of Study
Completed.
Results
- Group M--Macular Edema: Macular grid photocoagulation was effective in reducing angiographic evidence of macular edema but did not improve visual acuity in eyes with reduced vision due to macular edema from CVO.
- Group N--Panretinal Photocoagulation for Nonischemic CVO: Prophylactic panretinal photocoagulation did not prevent the development of iris neovascularization in eyes with 10 or more disc areas of retinal capillary nonperfusion confirmed by fluorescein angiography. Rather, results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrate that it is safe to wait for the development of early iris neovascularization and then apply panretinal photocoagulation.
- Group I--Indeterminate: Eyes with such extensive intraretinal hemorrhage that it is not possible to determine the retinal capillary perfusion status act as if they are ischemic or nonperfused.
Publications
The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group: Natural history and clinical management of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 115: 486-491, 1997.
The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group: Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in central vein occlusion. The CVOS Group M Report. Ophthalmol 102: 1425-1433, 1995.
The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group: A randomized clinical trial of early panretinal photocoagulation for ischemic central vein occlusion. The CVOS Group N Report. Ophthalmol 102: 1434-1444, 1995.
Clarkson JG, Central Vein Occlusion Study Group: Central vein occlusion study: Photographic protocol and early natural history. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 92: 203-215, 1994.
The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group: Baseline and early natural history report. Arch Ophthalmol 111: 1087-1095, 1993.
Resource Centers
Chairman's Office and Fundus Photograph Reading Center
John G. Clarkson, M.D.
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
University of Miami School of Medicine
900 Northwest 17th Street
Miami, FL 33101
Telephone: (305) 326-6375
Coordinating Center
Argye Hillis, Ph.D.
Biostatistics Department
Scott and White Hospital
2401 South 31st Street
Temple, TX 76508
Telephone: (817) 724-7748
Fax: (817) 662-3867
NEI Representative
Donald F. Everett, M.A.
National Eye Institute
National Institutes of Health
Executive Plaza South, Suite 350
6120 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7164
Bethesda, MD 20892
Telephone: (301) 496-5983
Fax: (301) 402-0528
Last Updated: 10/21/99