Skip to main content
Home

Search


NEI on Social Media | Search A-Z | en español | Text size S M L
Share
  • About NEI
    • NEI Research Accomplishments
    • Budget and Congress
    • About the NEI Director
    • History of the NEI
    • NEI 50th Anniversary
    • NEI Women Scientists Advisory Committee (WSAC)
    • Board of Scientific Counselors
    • National Advisory Eye Council (NAEC)
    • Donating to the NEI

     Contact Us

     Visiting the NIH Campus

    Mission Statement

    As part of the federal government’s National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Eye Institute’s mission is to “conduct and support research, training, health information dissemination, and other programs with respect to blinding eye diseases, visual disorders, mechanisms of visual function, preservation of sight, and the special health problems and requirements of the blind.”

  • News & Events
    • Events Calendar
    • NEI Press Releases
    • News from NEI Grantees
    • Spokesperson bios
    • Statistics and Data
    • Resources for the media

    Pressroom Contacts

    Dustin Hays - Chief, Science Communication
    dustin.hays@nih.gov

    Kathryn DeMott, Media Relations
    Kathryn.DeMott@nih.gov

    NEI Office of Communications
    (301)496-5248

  • Health Information
    • Frequently asked questions
    • Clinical Studies
    • Publications Catalog
    • Photos and Images
    • Spanish Language Information
  • Grants and Funding
    • Extramural Research
    • Division of Extramural Science Programs
    • Division of Extramural Activities

    Extramural Contacts

    NEI Division of Extramural Research
    Suite 1300
    5635 Fishers Lane, MSC 9300
    Bethesda, MD 20892-9300
    (Courier services use: Rockville, MD 20852)
    301-451-2020

  • Research at NEI
    • Office of the Scientific Director
    • Office of the Clinical Director
    • Laboratories, Sections and Units
    • Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications
    • eyeGENE

    Research Directors Office

    Office of the Scientific Director

    Sheldon S. Miller, Ph.D., Scientific Director
    David M. Schneeweis, Ph.D., Deputy Scientific Director

    Office of the Clinical Director

    Brian P. Brooks, M.D, Ph.D., Clinical Director
    Emily Y. Chew, M.D., Deputy Clinical Director

  • Education Programs
    • National Eye Health Education Program (NEHEP)
    • Diabetic Eye Disease Education Program
    • Glaucoma Education Program
    • Low Vision Education Program
    • Hispanic/Latino Program
    • Vision and Aging Program
    • African American Program
  • Training and Jobs
    • Fellowships
    • NEI Summer Intern Program
    • Diversity In Vision Research & Ophthalmology (DIVRO)
    • Student Training Programs

    To search for current job openings visit HHS USAJobs

Home >> News >> Pressreleases >> Contacts better than permanent lenses for babies after cataract surgery
Listen

Topics

Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
AIDS-related eye disease (cytomegalovirus [CMV] retinitis)
Amblyopia
Anophthalmia and Microphthalmia
Appointments
Astigmatism
Audacious Goals Challenge
Awards
Behçet’s Disease of the Eye
Bietti's Crystalline Dystrophy
Blepharitis
Blepharospasm
Cataracts
Clinical Studies
coloboma
Color Blindness
Convergence Insufficiency (CI)
Cornea
Diabetic Eye Disease
Dry Eye
Education Programs
Eye Cancer
Eye Surgery
Floaters
Gene
Glaucoma
Healthy Vision Month
Hispanic/Latino Americans
Histoplasmosis
Hyperopia
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
Infancy
Infectious Eye Disease
Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA)
Low Vision
Macular Degeneration
Macular Edema
Macular Hole
Macular Pucker
Myopia
NEI
NEI Remembers
NEI Website
Optic Nerve Disorders
Pink Eye (Conjunctivitis)
Preschool
Rare Diseases
Refractive Errors
Refractive Surgery
Retina
Retinal Disease
Retinitis Pigmentosa
Retinoblastoma
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Retinoschisis
Spanish
Spanish
Stargardt Disease
Stem Cells
Usher Syndrome
Uveitis/Inflammatory Eye Disease
Vision Screening
World Sight Day

Contacts better than permanent lenses for babies after cataract surgery

Permanent lenses lead to more repeat eye surgeries, NIH study finds

03/06/14
A child wearing a contact lens. A green dye is used to evaluate the fit of hard lenses. Credit: Dr. Scott Lambert, Emory.

For adults and children who undergo cataract surgery, implantation of an artificial lens is the standard of care. But a clinical trial suggests that for most infants, surgery followed by the use of contact lenses for several years—and an eventual lens implant—may be the better solution. The trial was funded in part by the National Eye Institute (NEI), a component of the National Institutes of Health.

A cataract is a clouding of the eye’s lens, and can be removed through a safe, quick surgical procedure. After cataract removal, most adults and children receive a permanent artificial lens, called an intraocular lens (IOL). This is an option for infants, too, but the trial found that the use of contact lenses is safer than, and just as effective as, an IOL for infants under seven months old. The most recent data from the trial were published today in JAMA Ophthalmology.

“When we began this study, the prevailing theory was that IOLs would be the better option for cataract in infants because they correct vision constantly, while contact lenses can be removed or dislodged from the eye. But our data suggest that if the family can manage it, contact lenses are the better option until the child gets older,” said Scott Lambert, M.D., the study’s lead investigator and a professor of ophthalmology at Emory University in Atlanta.

Although cataracts are often tied to aging, it’s estimated that 1,200-1,600 infants are diagnosed with congenital cataracts (present from birth) each year in the United States. The condition can affect both eyes, but it often affects just one, which is called unilateral cataract. The new study compared the use of IOLs versus the use of contact lenses during infancy for treating congenital unilateral cataract.

In the United States most children with cataract will eventually receive an IOL, but the timing varies, Dr. Lambert said. “I’ve had patients wait until they were in college whereas others will have it done when they are 5 or 6 years old,” he said.

Some prior research suggested that using an IOL to treat cataract during infancy can improve long-term visual outcomes, he said. IOLs can also spare babies—and their parents—the discomfort of daily contact lens changes, and reduce the risk of introducing germs into the eye. On the other hand, the use of IOLs during infancy also has some drawbacks. Surgeons have difficulty judging the right focusing power of the artificial lens for an infant, because it’s a time of rapid eye growth. Also, while IOL implants are typically safe and complication-free for adults, they are more likely to cause postoperative problems for infants.

“Cataract surgery and the use of IOLs for infants have become more sophisticated and more widely practiced over time. In this study, the goal was to determine if the beneficial effects of IOLs outweigh their known complications,” said Donald Everett, M.A., who is NEI’s director of collaborative clinical research.

The Infant Aphakia Treatment Study began in 2004 (aphakia refers to an eye without a lens). The study involved 12 clinical centers, and enrolled infants with a cataract in one eye. Parents visiting these clinics were informed about the study, and about the potential benefits and risks of cataract surgery with and without an IOL. The study ultimately enrolled 114 infants who were between 1 to 6 months old at the time of surgery. By random assignment, about half of the infants received an IOL and the other half received contact lenses. The lenses were soft silicon or hard gas-permeable plastic, and designed to fit small eyes.

The children in the study are now toddlers, and the investigators have examined visual acuity and other outcomes over the long term in both treatment groups. Of note, visual acuity testing in studies like this one presents unique challenges. An adult visual acuity test involves that familiar eye chart with rows of progressively smaller letters, and isn’t feasible for a child who hasn’t learned the alphabet. The 1-year-olds in the study were tested with Teller acuity cards, which are flash cards imprinted with finer and finer grating patterns—the idea being that a visible pattern will grab a baby’s attention while a card that looks blank will not. At 4 1/2 years old, the children were evaluated with the HOTV test, which requires kids to read the letters H-O-T-V or match flash cards containing one of the letters to a response card in their hands.

There were no significant differences in visual acuity between the two groups at age 1, or at age 4 1/2. However, there were more post-surgical complications in the IOL group, which in turn led to more corrective surgeries. The most frequent complication was lens reproliferation—which is when lens cells left behind after cataract surgery migrate into the pupil and interfere with vision. By age 5, lens reproliferation was 10 times more common with IOLs, occurring in 23 (40 percent) of infants in that group, compared to two infants (4 percent) in the contact lens group. This complication and others led to the need for one or more additional eye surgeries among 41 (72 percent) of the infants in the IOL group, and 12 (21 percent) in the contact lens group.

By age 5, nine children in the contact lens group developed minor eye infections that cleared up with antibiotic drops, and in one child, a contact lens broke during wear. None of these issues had permanent effects on vision. Three infants in the contact lens group had IOLs implanted before age 5, because their families had difficulty with day-to-day contact lens changing and maintenance.

“We think that for most infants with unilateral cataract, contact lenses are a better option than an IOL,” Dr. Lambert said. “However, in some cases, the parents and their physician may decide that contact lens wear proves to be too challenging, and ultimately not in the child’s best interests.”

Aside from potential discomfort for the child and anxiety for the parents, there may be less obvious challenges to wearing contact lenses in infancy. Congenital cataract is sometimes hereditary, which means that some parents may have vision problems of their own that would make it difficult to change their kids’ contacts. Affordability could also be a challenge for some families. Although health insurance plans generally pay for an IOL, most plans do not pay for contact lenses.

Why not delay both the cataract removal and the IOL until later in childhood? In that scenario, the loss of visual experience in early life could cause some permanent vision loss later, Dr. Lambert said.

The study was funded by NEI through grants EY013272, EY013287, and EY006360, and by Research to Prevent Blindness. For more information about the study, see NCT00212134 at http://clinicaltrials.gov. For more information about cataract, see http://www.nei.nih.gov/health/cataract/.

References: 

Lambert, SR et al. for the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study Group. “A comparison of contact lens and intraocular correction for monocular aphakia during infancy: a randomized clinical trial of HOTV optotype acuity at age 4.5 years and clinical findings at age 5 years.” JAMA Ophthalmology, March 2014. DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.531.

Contact: 

National Eye Institute
(301) 496-5248
neinews@nei.nih.gov

  • NEI Home
  • Contact Us
  • A-Z Site Map
  • NEI on Social Media
  • Information in Spanish (Información en español)
  • Website, Social Media Policies and Other Important Links
  • NEI Employee Emergency Information
  • NEI Intranet (Employees Only)

*PDF files require the free Adobe® Reader® software for viewing.

This website is maintained by the NEI Office of Science Communications, Public Liaison, and Education.
Technical questions about this website can be addressed to the NEI Website Manager.
Department of Health and Human Services | The National Institutes of Health | USA.gov NIH…Turning Discovery Into Health ®